Rethinking what it means to be "good at math."

Jump to a Section

I believe mathematics classrooms should value:

• thinking over speed, 

• reasoning over memorization, 

• curiosity over compliance,

• and understanding over performance. 

Students do not all process information, communicate, participate, or demonstrate understanding in the same ways. Differences in attention, executive functioning, language processing, sensory processing, and communication are part of human variability, not evidence that a student is incapable of mathematical thinking. 

Rather than asking: 

"How do we fix this student?"

I believe educators should also ask: 

"What barriers might this environment be creating?"

Small changes in classroom design can significantly impact who feels successful, who participates, and who begins to believe they belong in mathematics. 

Rethinking What it Means to be "Good at Math"

For many students, being “good at math” has very little to do with how deeply they think. It often comes down to speed, memorization, and how quickly they can reproduce procedures.

But what happens when classroom structures reward the fastest students instead of the most thoughtful ones?

“Students remember when they were trusted before they could prove themselves.”